Why Bush Won And Gore Lost In 2000

[niteflyer]

Well, I dont really know, but in the history of American presidential elections, he who has the most "blue blood" has always won. It has always been like this, no exceptions. Look it up yourselves. Interestingly enough, that means Kerry will win this one, as his blood is "more blue". Personally, I think Bush is the next winner?? It should also be pointed out that this is the first time in history that 2 "skull and bones" club members have ever run against each other...what this all means is anybodies guess as far as I know??

[dutchie]

Forgive this ignorant Dutchie, coming from a monarchy... What exactly do you mean by "blue" blood?!?

[DontBeAfraid]

The priveledged dutchie.... There are still 2 classes of people in the US, the common folk and the blue bloods.... Those with REALLY old family money.

[dutchie]

Ah.. Privileged?!? I'd rather get rid of the monarchy today in stead of tomorrow.. There's absolutely no use at all for a monarchy in this day and age, it just costs a lot of money, money far better spent on schooling and healthcare...

[Emerald_Dragon]

[conjecture]i think "blue-bloods" are people who can trace their lineage back to Adam/Eve. I think. However, the term was used to describe the baby's born of royal blood, whose skin tone was tinged slightly blue, to give off the impression their blood was blue.

But now, I'm more inclined to believe, that bluebloods, are descendants of the Nefilim, who were chosen to lead the human race, after it was created. And through the centuries, these descendants fought amongst each other for the right to rule, until peace broke out, due to the people getting tired of fighting. So out of tradition and cosmic order, those amongst the blueblood, have allowed other bluebloods to lead, so long as they were of higher ranking.

How is the ranking decided? I would guess, based on the ancient god the high priests worshipped and their ranks. I could be all wrong, though, just piecing together from many sources.

[DontBeAfraid]

Nobody can trace their blood back to the FICTIONAL adam and eve.....

[niteflyer]

Well, its like this....about 26,000 years ago a very superior pair of beings were created for a mission to earth. Their purpose was to uplift the human race, thru interbreeding with superior genes, and thru social interactions, by using their superior intellects to educate and develop spirituality in the existing human stocks.
These beings were blue, both in skin and blood. As time progressed these were the natural leaders of the human race, human, but blessed with better intellect, genes, and spiritual capacity. As time went on of course the blood got diluted, but of course the purer specimens kept their lines as pure as possible, and their leadership intact.
As time went on, the blue got more and more diluted, and the last of the blues that were pure enough to be colored blue died out, but there still existed strains of relatively pure blue stock, still blessed, and still natural leaders.
Until historic times, the "bluebloods" were the natural leaders, but now, the blood is so dilute that the inferior pre uplift genes dominate, and as most know, it is not good for family without impeccable genes to intermarry, so the existing impure "bluebloods" interbred themselves out of a position of natural leadership.
Their ininterupted leadership still gives them powerful positions and connections, although many if not most no longer have superior genes, actually, many of them are so inbred that some trailer trash may have better genes. Money is still power though, and most of the real leaders of the world come from ancient bloodlines, although few admit much knowledge of it, they are very aware.
Today, you can only see the blue coloring in some of the Eithiopean stock, and to a lesser degree, some Dane and Norse stock. Anyone that possesses the recessive gene for blue eyes has a little more than average, and
blue eyes were unknown on earth prior to the Adamic uplift. Caucasions and Eithiopeans seem to have the most apparent...
Ever wondered why the post dark age paintings originally portrayed Jesus as blue (he wasnt)..it was to show his "nobility". (Jesus deliberatly picked very average stock). If you look at the Vedas and other Chinese and Indian art, you will see the "royalty" depicted as blue...
This is not widely known now though, seeing there are no blue colored people running around. Its funny how soon people forget the past. Im just waiting for the human genome project to "discover" this uplift...it will be real interesting how they interpret it...
Hope that explains it...

[niteflyer]

You are very wrong. I personally know members of at least 40 families that can, and have a list of over 300 that was presented to me at a very early age by my maternal grandmother. Also, note that it was an expectation that I marry and produce offspring from that list, and as luck?? would have it, met and married my Yale sweetheart from a family on that list. It is a very old tradition...and these are all prominent families...

[DontBeAfraid]

Niteflyer creation is a myth.... The list of people who say they can trace their lineage back to adam and eve is just a list.... fabricated a long time ago, maybe, by someone who thought too highly of themselves or had too much time on their hands....

Dont bother sending me your instructions for the levitating television.... You are a fake and have ceased to amuse me.

[niteflyer]

But the beings represented by Adam and Eve did exist....and the human race was already present.
By the way, I just did a quick bit of research and it turns out that Kerry and Bush are once removed 14th cousins..Im telling you, family is very important to THE families, and if you are right, and Adam and Eve didnt exist, then all the families I mentioned are descended from the same couple, whoever they are. Prepare for a shock because science is getting VERY close....

[DontBeAfraid]

Are there blue bloods? yes... Do the blue bloods still run everything? certainly... Are they all one big happy family? Ill bet they are... Are they descendants from a mythical couple? Most certainly NOT.

[niteflyer]

Well, if you ARE right, then alot of US have lists that go back 26,000 years to common ancestry. Every little branch is documented. Ive inherited 2 filing cabinets dedicated to my bloodline and alot of it is VERY old. Some my father sealed in plasic and replaced the air with CO2 to preserve. Alot of very old families are gonna be disappointed..the human genome project will prove the ancestry to 1 couple...interpret it how you want.

[dutchie]

Originally Posted by niteflyer

Well, its like this....about 26,000 years ago a very superior pair of beings were created for a mission to earth. Their purpose was to uplift the human race, thru interbreeding with superior genes, and thru social interactions, by using their superior intellects to educate and develop spirituality in the existing human stocks.
These beings were blue, both in skin and blood. As time progressed these were the natural leaders of the human race, human, but blessed with better intellect, genes, and spiritual capacity. As time went on of course the blood got diluted, but of course the purer specimens kept their lines as pure as possible, and their leadership intact.
As time went on, the blue got more and more diluted, and the last of the blues that were pure enough to be colored blue died out, but there still existed strains of relatively pure blue stock, still blessed, and still natural leaders.

Are you being sarcistic THIS TIME?!? Because you MUST be talking about the smurfs, aren't you?!?

[DontBeAfraid]

His records pre-date paper.. :/

[Emerald_Dragon]

>....about 26,000 years ago a very superior pair of beings were created for a mission to earth.

a book i've read, talks about the ADA.MU and the EVE, being created by the Sumerian gods, using their DNA and elements of "clay" from the earth. Zecharia Sitchin, "The Twelfth Planet", its 1 man's 30 year quest, to finding the origins of man, which lead him to the Fertile Crescent as the cradle of life. He goes on to explain the lineage of god-kings and human-kings, over the millenia, as recorded/recovered in the Sumerian tablets.

His Earth Chronicles are an interesting read. He corroborates Bible texts, archaeological finds, and language translations, to bridge the gaps in pre-historic times. According to him, the biblical creation myth was taken directly from the Sumerian myths. He argues that Adam and Eve did exist, but as a sort of lab experiment.


>These beings were blue, both in skin and blood.

I find this too hard to believe.
I've read its because they were born that way, but the tinge went away as they aged.
BTW, blood is blue, until it gets oxygenated. I think blue bloods are born with lots of veins close to the skin surface, making them appear blue. When you have kids, can you prove or disprove my theory?


>Until historic times, the "bluebloods" were the natural leaders,

hereditary. the chosen. the god-selected rulers.


>the human genome project will prove the ancestry to 1 couple...interpret it how you want.

i know. they've already narrowed it down to like, 3 (?) earth mothers. 1 euro-caucasian, 1 african, 1 middle-eastern/asian. Intriguing stuff.

[niteflyer]

Well, like it or not "WE" believe this stuff; and "WE" rule the world. My genetics are 2nd generation Adamic thru the Nodites, one of the Sankik tribes. Specifically a Nodite leader by the name of Van, mated with a daughter of Adam and Eve. And yes, the "creation" myth that is known today originated with the Sumerians, and the Adamic bloodlines all came from the Tigris and Euphrates river basins. Yes, the records predate paper, and predate the Sumerians by thousand of years, but the records of the bloodlines were considered the hope of humanity in prehistoric times and religiously preserved. It was considered vital to the race...the records persist today, and are very jealously sheltered from harm. I can give anyone who asks a HUGE history lesson, as I was taught. I keep telling you all that I have a very unusual background, and I have been thoroughly educated in my birthright.
I might be just a minor player, but I HAVE been blessed with a very high IQ, and my bloodlines mean that I have trust and acceptance from others that trace their lines by birthright, which gives me lots of connections, advantages, and potential power just because of my blood. Its a very exclusive club, and it still rules the world. I can ask help or favors from others I have never even met, and it is their (and my)duty to enhance my (or their) material well being and safety if requested. You have no idea how deep this is..

[niteflyer]

By the way. On the earth today we still have reasonably pure black men, white men, yellow men, and red men, all remainders of the Sankik tribes. With the desireability of the blue blood, why is it so hard to accept that they have been mongrelized out??

[Emerald_Dragon]

> I can give anyone who asks a HUGE history lesson, as I was taught.

teach me. it may be wasted effort on others, mainly cuz its so far out there. but my conclusions, are pretty far out there.

i know you're history may not exactly jive with what we've all grown to accept, but i'm sure it will collaborate with something i've read. just piecing it together and learning what to believe. your input would be appreciated.

your "exclusive club" may help to explain some of the numerous secret societies.... or something like that...

BLUE BLOOD
[Q] From Jennifer in the USA: “I was wondering about the origin of the phrase blue blood.”
[A] Unlike so many other expressions, this one is well documented. It’s a direct translation of the Spanish sangre azul. Many of the oldest and proudest families of Castile used to boast that they were pure bred, having no link with the Moors who had for so long controlled the country, or indeed any other group. As a mark of this, they pointed to their veins, which seemed bluer in colour than those of such foreigners. This was simply because the blue-tinted venous blood showed up more prominently in their lighter skin, but they took it to be a mark of their pure breeding. So the phrase blue blood came to refer to the blood which flowed in the veins of the oldest and most aristocratic families. The phrase was taken over into English in the 1830s.

[kathaksung]

Bad economy (Bush 3)

Bush boasted his tax cut policy. But since his three years of tax cut, the economy in consecutive years goes worse.

Bush government manipulate numbers to cheat people. Said economy is improved. Let's see some absolute numbers:

1. Bush has the worst job creation in 40 years. He is the only one got negative.

Total Nonfarm Payrolls (thous.) Bureau of Labor Statistics Establishment Survey

period ....start......end......Jobs created ..%chng....President
61-64....53,681... 59,583....5,902..... 11.15%...JFK/Johnson
65-68....59,583... 69,438 ...9,855....... 16.54% ....Johnson
69-72....69,438 ...75,620....6,182 .........8.90%....Nixon
73-76....75,620.. .80,692....5,072 ........6.71%....Nixon/Ford
77-80....80,692 ...91,100 ...10,408 .......5.77% ....Reagan I
85-88....96,353 ..107,132 ..10,779 ......11.19%.... Reagan II
89-92..107,132 ..109,725 ...2,593 .......2.42%...Bush, GHW
93-96 .109,725 ..121,232 ..11,507 .....10.49% ....Clinton I
97-00..121,232...132,436...11,204 .......9.24% ....Clinton II
01-8/04 .132,436 .131475 .... -961 .....-0.72%.....Bush, GW

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/PAYEMS.txt

2. Decreased income.

I.R.S. Says Americans' Income Shrank for 2 Consecutive Years
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

Adjusted for inflation, the income of all Americans fell 9.2 percent from 2000 to 2002, according to the new I.R.S. data.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/29/bu...2RoUhGrVOfclPA

3. Increased poverty.

More Americans Uninsured, Living in Poverty
Census Data Shows Third Straight Annual Increase in Both Categories
By GENARO C. ARMAS, AP

WASHINGTON (Aug. 26) - The number of Americans living in poverty increased by 1.3 million last year, while the ranks of the uninsured swelled by 1.4 million, the Census Bureau reported Thursday..... It was the third straight annual increase for both categories. ...Approximately 35.8 million people lived below the poverty line in 2003,

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/arti...26103709990008

Yet media (So said crdible media poll like CNN, Gallop, ABC...) always matains Bush's rate around 50%. Said Bush leads over Kerry 11%. And news in internet said in electorade vote, Bush will have a landslide victory. Do you believe it? Do American people would rather vote for a president who proved bad?

---------------

This is how insider group manipulate American election. They steal it by intelligent covert job. (Those who controlled intelligence, they controlled election office) And make people believe the result is reasonable by fake poll.

[dutchie]

Seems to me the numbers speak for themselves..

[kathaksung]

Dirty tactic (Bush 5)

Lie, cheating, intimidation, revenge, propaganda.... that's dirty tactics Bush done to stay in presidency.

Of course, the biggest lie is the WMD Bush used to mislead US to the war of Iraq. From the book of former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, former counter terrorism adviser Richard Clark, Bob Woodward, Joseph Wilson we know from beginning Bush determined to have a war with Iraq. WMD was only an excuse. When Wilson revealed it, he was punished. Someone leaked the ID of his wife that she was a CIA agent.

Now WMD lie is broken off. Bush changes the tone, said it was for freedom, world becomes safer. Does world becomes safer? Iraq war may created more terrorists for the world. Do Iraq people feel safer? Since Bush invaded Iraq, tens of thousand of innocent Iraqi civilians died. Bush dares not to declare the casualty of civilians. The reality is US replaces Saddam to be the biggest threat to Iraqi people. The killing is going on.

According to Bush's propaganda, Hitler may become a hero. The tactic Hitler used is followed by Bush. Hitler started his pre-emptive war targeted at Communist Russian. If Bush's justification stands, Hitler would have more reason to say his war was a right one that his purpose was to eliminate evil Stalin and made world safer. To start a slaughter (war) based on personal belief, or exactly, for the interest of a little group. Bush is no other than Hitler. He is a war criminal.

Another lie was a report given to people this April that terrorist attack worldwide had declined 45% since 2001, dropping to its lowest level in 34 years. Deputy Secretary of State Armitage said it offered "clear evidence " that Bush administration was prevailing in the fight against global terrorism. Later it was proved wrong, because in fact, in 2003, terror attack had risen significantly. News said it was the first time State Department had to rewrite it significantly since they were ordered to issue report 15 years ago. Is it just a mistake? No, April was the month of insurgence of Al Fallujah, as well as the Shiite insurgence in south. Bush's lie -"Iraqis welcome US libration" was broken. To save his fame, they issued another lie to cover up the broken lie.

To smear his rival, Bush camp push out a "Swift boat veteran team". With which it turned a Vietnam war veteran into a lier, coward. The result is you may doubt something wrong with the reward system of US Army(or Navy). How could Army gave a coward medal one after another? Because they foresaw Kerry would be US president candidate? Or simply US Army is a blinder? Or these Vietnam heroes were actually all cowards? But whatever the media said, there is one thing I know clearly, that is, Bush at that time, escaped Vietnam war duty. With his family relationship, he went to National guard to avoid to go to a dangerous war field - Vietnam.
Who is coward?

Yet, they made a Vietnam war veteran with 5 medals a coward, a lier. And made a real coward, lier, a Vietnam war deserter a "decisive leader". They can even turn "job lost" into positive. (They said it's good in long term to US to offshore job to overseas.) And invent something new such like "jobless recovery" to cover up a bad economy. This is how brand name media such like ABC, CNN, USA Today, Gallup...., under the direct of inside group, to turn white into black. Reversing the truth. Change negative into positive. They maintain a notorious, incompetent, dishonest president a 50% approve rate, and leads over his challenger with reluctant reason. The poll number are from their own mouth and can never proved by independent organization. Do you believe it?

----------------------------

This is how insider group manipulate American election. They steal it by intelligent covert job. (Those who controlled intelligence, they controlled election office) And make people believe the result is reasonable by fake poll.

[Onikiri]

Originally Posted by midnightsonblaze

Sorry Sub.....but in those four years since this has happened look at where the US stands now.......with the economy & war and all of those allies we now have!!!!......Just like his Dad....Bush fk'd the country up and someone new needs to be in there to help fix it up

I forget everything I read a biography on Bush Sr. 5 years ago and from my view he f'ed nothing up. That's also the first time I've heard Bush Sr. f'ed it up. I'm sure if he had we would see a picture of the two listing what he f'ed up and would see "Like father, like son"

[VegasRonin]

It should also be pointed out that this is the first time in history that 2 "skull and bones" club members have ever run against each other...what this all means is anybodies guess as far as I know??

It means that the choice has been taken from the American people.

Ron Rosenbaum, author of the book Explaining Hitler and a columnist for The New York Observer who has written extensively about the secret society, calls Bones a kind of extended family with the protections and loyalties and locked lips that such a family affords.

"You often see news reports that say Bush and Kerry were in Skull and Bones, but in fact they still are in Skull and Bones," says Rosenbaum, a classmate of Bush's at Yale who has long been curious about the club, even videotaping a nighttime rite in the secret society's courtyard a few years ago. "When you have two presidential candidates who come from that same extended family, I think it's a challenge ... to examine the influence that this family has had on them."

If Kerry wins, three of the last four presidents will have hailed from Skull and Bones, Rosenbaum points out. The presumptive Democratic nominee and the Republican incumbent share this old-guard tradition, as did the first President Bush.

WAKE UP!

[kathaksung]

Dark future (Bush 4)

Bush blows trumpet that he cut tax for you. It's only a trick to wangle votes. When he disguised as a Santa Clause to give you a tax cut cheque, at same time he quitely put a debt bill into that sock too.

He had cut tax for three years. The federal dificit went up for three years at a record high. It will hit a historical 422 billion dollars this year in adition to 375 billion of last year. The national dificit will be 2.2 trillion in next decade. If the tax cut goes on, then it will double to 4.4 trillion.

To fill the hole of that dificit, government have to borrow from financial market which will cause the rising of interest rate. As a result, it will leads to the break out of two bubbles: housing market and stock market.

The federal benchmark interest rate stays below 2% for three years since 2001. It creates a big credit bubble.

Personal debt increased, as well as national debt. The interest rate now is going up. Federal reserve bank has raised the rate three times in recent months. The rate is still below 2%. There is still a long road to go to the reasonable rate level. Meanwhile, housing market bubble and stock market bubble will break out at any time.

That's what we will face: a long time stagnant economy. And with great possibility, a big economy downturn when the two big credit bubbles exploded.

Bush dramatically increased national dificit. And allowed two big economic bubbles created which endangered financial market. We will have a very dark future. Main stream media rarely tell people about this. They keep issue the poll to maintain Bush's approve rate at around 50% and say he is steadily lead over Kerry at 8 %. Do people really not care about their pocket? Do they really support a president who bring them a bad economy?

------------------

This is how insider group manipulate American election. They steal it by intelligent covert job. (Those who controlled intelligence, they controlled election office) And make people believe the result is reasonable by fake poll.