What ever happened to Saddam Hussien?

Have anybody ever wondered what ever happened to Saddam Hussien? Yes I know he got captured by the American Troops , but we hadn't heard from him for a while now.

Please share your comments

[lotrfan55345]

Enjoying the lavish treatment in the bomb shelter Cheney built with your tax $$$.

Golden toilet seats, 60'' plasama UHDTV with UHDTV Al-Jezeera via secret Illuminati network direct from Qatar. Everything you could ever want.

[Chrisboe4ever]

Saddam served his purpose already: Destract the public from the passing of the Patriot Act II. And just like lotrfan said, he's livin' the good life.

[Bigsky770]

- - -Just to let you know, [as all may want to keep informed on this], Saddam is currently undergoing a very intensive session of behavior modification that includes (but is not limited to) the following; daily classes on the subject of "political correctness" taught by Hillary Clinton/and/Barbara Striesand; Home Economics taught by Martha Stewart; Physical Education, Pee-Wee Herman/Richard Simmons; needle-point classes by Charles Manson; Inter-Personal relationships; Boy George/Michael Jackson. And finally, waffle-making by John Kerry.

- - -You may be pleased to know that his reading material must be approved by a Gov't panel before it should reach him, most favoured reading material on his list is;

1. Home and Garden
2. Boy's life
3. Rolling Stone
4. Reader's Digest

- - -He is also restricted as to that television programming he may enjoy; No violence in television programming is to be permitted

1. Car 54 where are you?
2. I love lucy
3. The Brady Bunch
4. The courtship of Eddie's father
5. Green Acres
6. Gidjet
7. Leave it to Beaver

- - -In closing it should also be mentioned here that he has been exposed to "subliminal messaging" whereas the phrase "Jerry Lewis is the greatest comedic talent in the world" is re-played over-and-over. This is done in order so that Saddam may better comprehend the (ahem) "French" way of thinking. . . .Latest reports show that he is doing quite well in all areas. . . .Only problem area seems to be that he has been awakening suddenly in the middle-of-the-night and has been heard to scream; "MARSHA-MARSHA-MARSHA!!!" (the significance of this is still under study). . . .



Joe (Bigsky770)

[Defiant Noquisi]

ROFLMAO, Dangit Joe!! Yes I have wondered this myself a time or two.

THE LATEST NEWS ON SADDAM ~ PAROLED!!!!!!!!

http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s3i2922


and now for something serious....

All I could find was these comments by the shrub.....

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...5138-7475r.htm

[Emerald_Dragon]

>Destract the public from the passing of the Patriot Act II

really? i've been trying to find out if that was true. I was told it wasn't. Have a link?

[Coolio]

Yup, ive tought about what happend to Saddam Hussein. Im sure they didnt really catch him, the one they have is a fake, how come he would still be in Irak? he had months to leave the country, change his face, his identity. He is either very very stupid or they didnt catch him yet

[stewey]

Originally Posted by Coolio

Yup, ive tought about what happend to Saddam Hussein. Im sure they didnt really catch him, the one they have is a fake, how come he would still be in Irak? he had months to leave the country, change his face, his identity. He is either very very stupid or they didnt catch him yet

DNA tests confirmed it was him. I am sure they did catch him; he is currently being kept in Iraq awaiting trial for crimes against humanity. Again, not debating this war, just stating what I have read on cnn.com and such.

[Coolio]

How do we know it him? maybe the goverment faked it, even the DNA, we dont have proof that the DNA is his.

[stewey]

Well, if they did fake it, and the "real" Saddam appeared in a video message, the US would look real bad. I am sure he would do so also, if he was not in custody. Supposedly the tip that led to his capture came from his family members, so evidence is pointing that it is really him.

DNA is pretty hard to fake, even for a government. They would have to basically hush hush the entire scientific company that was involved with the DNA sample.

[Coolio]

Well its not IMPOSSILE.

A former biologist in the FBI laboratory pleaded guilty Tuesday to submitting falsified DNA analysis reports in more than 100 cases.

Jacqueline A. Blake, 40, of Upper Marlboro, Md., pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Washington to a single count of making false statements on official government reports she prepared. Blake faces a maximum penalty of a year in prison and a $100,000 fine at sentencing scheduled for Sept. 20.

http://courttv.com/news/2004/0519/dna_ap.html

[VegasRonin]

A former biologist in the FBI laboratory pleaded guilty Tuesday to submitting falsified DNA analysis reports in more than 100 cases.

I knew that 2nd child wasn't mine. She looks nothing like me.

[lotrfan55345]

The government would cut off all the grant $$$ if they didn't hush hush, they are all probably on high-survalance. That is if they did fake the DNA...

[Defiant Noquisi]

Here is the latest news about Saddam and what plans Bush has for him. I agree with Bush on this in that Saddam should be tried by the people he dictated over. Hopefully, it will be a good trial and the opening of doors for the Iraqi people to be able to have the Muslim lead country they want while interjecting meaningful and real democracy that everyone can benefit from, including a home for the Kurds....

Saddam's Future?

[FactsOverFiction]

Originally Posted by Defiant Noquisi

Here is the latest news about Saddam and what plans Bush has for him. I agree with Bush on this in that Saddam should be tried by the people he dictated over. Hopefully, it will be a good trial and the opening of doors for the Iraqi people to be able to have the Muslim lead country they want while interjecting meaningful and real democracy that everyone can benefit from, including a home for the Kurds....

Saddam's Future?

As in religious Muslim led? Or are you putting words in the Iraqi's mouths? I see some want it but when you say "Iraqi people to be able to have the Muslim lead country they want" it seems to me like you are assuming the majority want that?

There is relatively little support for a religious theocracy – it’s low on the list of preferred forms of government.
In one change from the first national poll in Iraq by Oxford Research International last fall, more now call for a “single strong Iraqi leader” – 47 percent say one will be needed a year from now, up from 27 percent previously. That’s more than say “an Iraqi democracy” will be needed, now 28 percent (essentially unchanged).
This interest in a strong leader (not necessarily an undemocratic one) seems based in security concerns. In an open-ended follow-up, references to “freedom” dominate support
for democracy, while those who express support for a single strong leader are more apt to cite the need for security and order in their country.

http://www.cpa-iraq.org/polls/ABC_Poll.pdf
Though I do agree with the Saddam issue being a Iraqi trial they deserve it after the things he put them through.

FoF

[Defiant Noquisi]

Originally Posted by FactsOverFiction

As in religious Muslim led? Or are you putting words in the Iraqi's mouths? I see some want it but when you say "Iraqi people to be able to have the Muslim lead country they want" it seems to me like you are assuming the majority want that?

I am not putting words in anyones mouths, the proof is around for the finding if you go beyond the scope of the polls. Unfortunately, the polls only cover people in towns that have a larger base of occupier freindly people and Allied Forces. It is too unstable and unsafe at this time to just go about the country polling more of the populace in "the boonies".

Hopefully that time will come soon since there are many others out there who have yet to be able to voice their opinions in their own country because it is dangerous. Some have been able to "get the word out" but it is very risky and happens much too rarely for outsiders to take seriously. There are people here who still have family there who can get word out on occasion. For alot of them, at least out in the sticks, they would like a government that will allow them "freedoms" and progress without having to compromise their beliefs.

Also, somehow the Kurdish people will need a voice too. I dont know this for fact but given conditions before the occupation, I wouldnt be surprised that there is much racism to overcome regarding them as well. I cant really comment as I dont know that much (except for the hardships as a people without a home) about them culturally.

There is also a risk at this time, of overthrowing a new leader if things become too "different" for the people to accept, or to be able to handle all the "newness" of the new found freedoms the people have yet to face. Remember, just because its claimed that the war itself is over, the battle is yet to be won. These people havent lived under the roof of a democracy and while there can be many good things about it, it is still a very foreign concept to them. The people will be learning to live life in a new and unfamiliar way and it can be frightening for them. Fear, in facing it and/or overcoming it will be the biggest factor in the Iraqi peoples lives.

It is not neccessary to enslave them because it is familiar. However, by them being allowed something familiar, (such as a Muslim form of democracy rather than dictatorship) that is of benefit to the people rather than just its leaders, it opens the doors slowly to a democratic form of government using beneficial Muslim beliefs rather than being based on them, if that is what the people decide they want. What people tend to forget is that being a Muslim is all encompassing, their beliefs encompass every facet of their lives.

Everything in moderation, and with a sh*tload of patience.

[MacRasta]

Like I said in my introduce yourself post, I read much more than I write, and it strikes me that no one talks about the media silence of Sadam. I read that all you people agree on a media bias, so Sadam IS tha man to use in it. Like I posted before, I personally met the honesty of the media, and those of you who experienced the same thing will agree with me : that's something you don't ever forget! So why the silence around Sadam all this time? We all know the US will use "Sadam footage" if it were in their advantage, I'm sure even Micky will agree on this.

Now the word on Mr. Hussein's soon to come decapitation.....

Everyone woke up........

All the posts about Nick, How to stop terrorisme, There is a god, Didn't Bush look.....and the lots

No-one bothered......

What's wrong? (you guys must admit there's something wrong in the picture, don't you?) ...I ask you!

Mac

[Defiant Noquisi]

It was my assumption that any footage and/or news of Saddam might be paraded for the masses just before elections. I could be wrong.

[FactsOverFiction]

I think they are keeping Saddam from view as to not create/incite/foment either Iraq public anger at him not being punished yet or former party members getting any idea's. Out of sight out of mind.


FoF

[Defiant Noquisi]

I'll agree on that, it worked on me but then I have been distracted as of late.

[Defiant Noquisi]

The legal custody of Saddam Hussein has been transfered to Iraq, but not physical custody.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/30/in...er=rssuserland

[MacRasta]

I'm very, very curious of how this Saddam movie is going to end.

VERY curious......

Mac

[Defiant Noquisi]

You and me both! Will the insurgents demand the same as they are committing on those they kidnap? Find out next time on, "As the Prisoner Squirms!"

[stewey]

As per the Geneva convention rules, you cannot show pictures of POW's. Remember the outrage after Saddam's army showed pictures of US pow's? Saddam is a POW, and they were technically not supposed to show pictures of him after capture, but they made an exception due to his high level profile.