Nostradamus - 2012 - Armageddon - End of the World Scenarios - Natural Disasters

~~MattMarriott~~ · May 17th, 2006, 8:12 AM

9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott

1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon. .
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: no live videos, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to accont for the "passengers".
Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

*bbbv3.5* · May 17th, 2006, 9:14 AM

And what about the 8 million New Yorkers who saw the plane hit the building? Your insane.

A video was released today showing Flight 77 hitting the plane, it s a distance huge white blur, and you can see the tail sections of the plan form. So that is wrong..

Passangers fake? No proof, just conpsiracy. And there were tons of video you fucking moron of the towers falling.

*stewey* · May 17th, 2006, 11:12 AM

I would like to see your sources, Matt

koolbluecat · May 18th, 2006, 12:08 AM

Someone interviewed a guy who was a taxi driver at the time and he said he definetely did NOT repeat NOT see a plane. He saw no wreckage whatsoever and whatever he saw moved so damn fast that it could not even be a plane. If its in the sky your going to see it come in because you are going to wonder what the f*** is making that roaring sound. No plane was seen before or after. Pentagon was hit by either a striker missle or fighter jet. And as far as Stewey and bbbv 3.0 goes : 1. Were you there? 2. Do you think that you would have been able to see something moving that damn fast and correctly identify it as a Boeing 747 jet? 3. Why must you guys blindly swallow lies when proof is staring you right in the face? Are you guys such big fans of the governments side of the story or have your heads so far up their butts that you cant see and blatantly refuse to even consider the other version of the story. Thats all.

Freakshow · May 18th, 2006, 8:09 AM

So one taxi drivers account of events beats all the other New Yorkers who said they saw a plane? You would think that if the goverment was going to say that a plane hit the WTC than they would take the time to actually do so.

*stewey* · May 19th, 2006, 8:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freakshow

So one taxi drivers account of events beats all the other New Yorkers who said they saw a plane? You would think that if the goverment was going to say that a plane hit the WTC than they would take the time to actually do so.

Yeah, if the government can send a fake plane into the WTC, why couldn't they send one into the Pentagon?

Powerdog30 · May 23rd, 2006, 1:44 PM

Now, I believe you are screaming conspiracy for the sake of conspiracy. Planes were seen hitting both buildings. People were talking to their loved ones seconds before the planes crashed. Wreckage was recovered from the Pentegon. Come on now... let's put this one to bed and move on to real conspiracies... like loch ness...

**loganosborne** · May 23rd, 2006, 2:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattMarriott

9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott

1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon. .
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: no live videos, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to accont for the "passengers".
Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

Again what about all the people who saw the planes hit the wtc on 9/11 i must of said this about 1000 times. The only bit of 9/11 that I have my suspcions about was the pentagon flight.

*Cartesiantheater* · May 24th, 2006, 1:51 PM

Hell, why didn't they just photoshop the whole thing? In fact, that's what happened! No one died! It was all trick photography! God, why didn't I see this before! All the people who cried wretchedly and who mourn even to this day are all being payed off! Of course! It was ALL a photoshop fake, in order to excuse the coming take over! The world trade center towers never fell! Hell, they probably never even existed! Now it's all becoming clear!...

Now that's 9/11 for dummies!

**lycanox** · May 24th, 2006, 2:07 PM

"There is no spoon"

Great, these theories are making things look so stupid no one will believe them any more.
Now the government has all freedom to pull another trick.

*Cartesiantheater* · May 25th, 2006, 5:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycanox

"There is no spoon"

Great, these theories are making things look so stupid no one will believe them any more.
Now the government has all freedom to pull another trick.

See? Now you see the depth of the conspiracy! It's the conspiracy theorists themselves who are perpetrating the conspiracy! They are being paid off! They are trying to make all conspiracy theories look so idiotic that the rest of us will believe anything the government says!

Can you see it's brilliance? Just marvel at it, slack-jawed, totally stupefied...

Wastelandwarrior · May 25th, 2006, 8:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattMarriott

9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott

1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon. .
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
BTW, first Video footage at the scene
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: no live videos, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to accont for the "passengers".
Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

ok man...
the first 3 points u made may have some truth to them...
but the last 2 were retarted.....
ok... fursure the second plane we saw hit the building live on CNN "LIVE" did happen
the first plane .... mabie not ... but there were alot of people that said they saw the first plane hit....
but the 5th point ....
so what the US government sent out a bunch of covert operatives to murder over 250 to 350 people in 1 day?
thats retarted dude...
retarted....
thats just way to elaborate of a plan and theres no way the government would have gotten away with this if they had done that....

~~MattMarriott~~ · Jun 10th, 2006, 4:24 AM

------------ - As far as the eyewitnesses:
9/11 NO planes vs. thousands of eyewitnesses & millions watching TV: praticability
http://forums.armageddononline.org/s...ead.php?t=6689

------------- On other developments:
Matt Marriott says Alex Jones is a CIA psy-op.

Bilderberg Group "detains" Alex Jones

Conclusions:
- Alex Jones is not a CIA psy-op.
- Matt Marriott is wrong. There really were planes.
Here a photo from the cockpit:

These news brought to you by ....
http://illuminati-web-of-disinformation.blogspot.com/

*lazserus* · Jun 10th, 2006, 6:18 AM

Cartesiantheater we should find a way to mate. I love your thinking.

Aside from me saying this post has no merit, I'd like to advertise that our frind Matt is a propoganda nut. He never debates or discusses things in any forum on this site. He only posts his twisted ideas and links to sites that are nothing more than his same ideas. Consider that, members, as you post.

Havoc Angel · Jun 10th, 2006, 6:22 AM

Maybe rename him into 'MattMarionette' ?

*stewey* · Jun 12th, 2006, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Havoc Angel

Maybe rename him into 'MattMarionette' ?

I was thinking MattMoronette

Justice · Jun 13th, 2006, 3:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerdog30

Now, I believe you are screaming conspiracy for the sake of conspiracy. Planes were seen hitting both buildings. People were talking to their loved ones seconds before the planes crashed. Wreckage was recovered from the Pentegon. Come on now... let's put this one to bed and move on to real conspiracies... like loch ness...

Yes some people do let their minds run away with them and you can find lots of sites planted by the government to create disinformation and sadly some people do fall for this trap and us that question the events of 9/11 do make mistakes but we don’t have the same access to the information as big brother and remember they went to elaborate lengths to keep it that way but one thing we do have is a brain that can think and has not been dubbed down with years of media and educational propaganda.

Give my regards to nessy

*lazserus* · Jun 13th, 2006, 3:17 AM

Quote:

Yes some people do let their minds run away with them and you can find lots of sites planted by the government to create disinformation

There are ways to actually find out how legit some sites are. Run a WHOIS on the domain, track the IP of the source, run a tracert on the IP and you can get an idea what loopsholes are being jumped through. It'd be fairly simple to find out how legit the site you were looking at was. It'd definitely take time and research, but it's not all that difficult.

~~MattMarriott~~ · Jun 14th, 2006, 8:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycanox

Great, these theories are making things look so stupid no one will believe them any more.
Now the government has all freedom to pull another trick.

Exactly. The Web of Disinformation set up by the Illuminati, exposed worldwide first time:
http://forums.armageddononline.org/s...ead.php?t=6847

*liberdave* · Jun 14th, 2006, 10:17 AM

Why dont you have the fact that there were no federal employees present @ the WTC on 9/11?

*bbbv3.5* · Jun 16th, 2006, 8:31 PM

He was insulting you Matt yet you talk to him like he was agreeing with you. Your post got ripped yet you dont reply. You sir are a coward. If I see you in the real world I shall kill you.

Wastelandwarrior · Jun 17th, 2006, 1:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbbv3.0

He was insulting you Matt yet you talk to him like he was agreeing with you. Your post got ripped yet you dont reply. You sir are a coward. If I see you in the real world I shall kill you.

ill help you

**loganosborne** · Jun 17th, 2006, 8:28 AM

Matt you do all these posts but you never debate and defend your opnion though.

~~MattMarriott~~ · Sep 18th, 2006, 2:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattMarriott

9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

Time to uncover the core cover-up
Time to add, to basic fact #3:
- "Unprecedented demolition technique" to the cover-up section;
- cover-up of what was that "Unprecedented demolition technique" to the web of disinformation section...

(1) The core lie is "there were planes". The core cover-up is what exactly was the unprecedented demolition technique used. See it here:
Mini H-bomb in basement. upwards directed: Finnish Military Expert solves last unclear issue about how 9/11 was executed
http://www.armageddononline.org/foru...ead.php?t=7901

Although this is not a fact, this theory has a degree pf probability close to 100 pct, since it's the only one that can explain
- the facts observed on 9/11;
- what happened to the survivors that were at the scene as the cores of the towers were turned into dust. They are either dead or terminally ill, the symptoms being again what you would expect from this theory.

One government uses nuclear bombs against its own citizens. A premiere that goes unnoticed... as you would expect from the Laws of End Times Reductionism.

sleepy2k16 · Sep 18th, 2006, 4:35 AM

Hey I believe 9/11 Was an inside job, But as far as no planes hitting the towers and cnn Animated it, that is insane. there must have been a million people or more that saw it with there own eyes, without the television.